Wednesday, November 17, 2010

The Internet and Your Faith: Beware and Be Wise Says the Pope


The Holy Father recently said that young people were being “numbed” by the Internet, adding that the technology was creating an “educational emergency — a challenge that we can and must respond to with creative intelligence.” The Holy Father said that these modern communications technologies should set off “an alarm bell” as it is blurring the boundary between truth and illusion. 
The internet and other modern means of communications - while undoubtedly presenting tremendous possibilities for authentic human progress - often give man a false sense of power and freedom. Here is what I mean: when one turns on his computer and goes onto the internet, a couple of things are at play. First, man is in control of the reality before him and he is able to manipulate it in a virtually infinite number of ways. Second, the information before him is virtually infinite - man could never exhaust it in his own lifetime - and therefore he receives a false sense of “knowledge” because “all” knowledge is seemingly “at his fingertips”.


The reason I bring up these points is because they represent a paradigm shift with regard to man’s encounter with reality. When man encounters the natural world, he encounters that which preceded him and will perdure after he returns to the dust of the earth. Second, there is wonder before the reality of creation in as much as man cannot fully account for it. It is not the product of man’s doing. This is where the Christian doctrine of creatio ex nihilo (creation from nothing) becomes an important hermeneutic for the understanding of who man is as man. Second, the increase of information creates the tragedy of the fragmentation of knowledge so that synthesis becomes all the more difficult and the interiorization of knowledge a dream to be found only in the days of yesteryear. As an example, the advantage of a physical library over the internet is that - for better or worse - somebody or a group of persons applied a criterion by which the quality of books were measured and upon which measure there admittance to the library was secured or rejected. 
Why this long digression on the dangers of the internet? As a Catholic blog, it should be said that the primary duty of priests and clerics is to preach those doctrines and morals which give glory to God and are necessary for the salvation of one’s soul. Revelation and therefore a knowledge of the Creed, the Sacraments, the moral life and the life of prayer is necessary for salvation. Without this knowledge, one would not be able to direct all of his actions to his last end, God, in whom lies eternal bless through the vision of his glory.
Herein lies the inestimable value of the Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas, The Catechism of the Council of Trent which Cardinal Ratzinger once called “The greatest Catholic Catechism”, and finally the beautiful Catechism of the Catholic Church. I encourage all who read this site to make time for these priceless syntheses of the Catholic faith.
We should thank God for the great works above cited as they treat of the Christian religion in a way that is most conducive to our growing in the knowledge of the faith. They help us to avoid the many pitfalls of other books, the internet and various publications; e.g. a multiplication of useless questions, the treatment of essentials in a less then desirable order and thoroughness, etc... 

Saint Isidore, patron of the internet, pray for us.

14 comments:

Reginaldus said...

Thanks Campion!
You remind us bloggers of the focus we must have in our writing...

I quote the Summa all the time, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church fairly often; but I don't know how often (if ever) I have used the Roman Catechism in a post...
Looks like I better get to work...perhaps for my commentary on the feast of Christ the King!

Peace and blessings to you!
btw, we just got our first round of snow out here...it's cold, but beautiful!

Nick said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Cordelia at Catholic Phoenix said...

Three things:

1.The theme of my senior seminar in college was about man's relationship to the cosmos. One of the things we discussed was how technology has a way of taking us farther and farther away from daily engaging with the natural world, e.g., grocery stores vs. growing your own food and keeping domestic animals for milk, cheese, eggs, meat, et cetera. I remember that we also figured that paper and books would probably become a thing of the past with the invention of computers and the internet--funny how we are starting to see that creep in. Also, one of the books we read was Fr. Louis Bouyer's "Cosmos" which helps us to see how man's perception of the natural world has been an integral part of salvation history, that God's presence and Glory is perceivable in the natural world.
2. I am taking a class called the "Theology of Death" and we just talked about Augustine's experience of a friend dying and how that led him to think: "I am a question to myself." Thus, giving birth to existential philosophy. That it is in actually seeing someone or something dead that we find the necessity to ask what the meaning of our existence is. And technology certainly has a way of helping us not to feel the impending finality of death with the way we can escape death and prolong life through the developments of science and the false sense of control over our life it gives us.
We also read this great poem,“Huntsman, What Quarry” by Edna St. Vincent Millay, which reminds me a lot of what you have said above about how a bunch of facts is not wisdom. According to J. Pieper, Philosophy, the love of wisdom, is said to be knowing how to die, which in turn is knowing how to live. The Pope said recently, and this sounds like Bouyer to me: "two thoughts for further reflection. First, as increasing accomplishments of the sciences deepen our wonder of the complexity of nature, the need for an interdisciplinary approach tied with philosophical reflection leading to a synthesis is more and more perceived. Secondly, scientific achievement in this new century should always be informed by the imperatives of fraternity and peace, helping to solve the great problems of humanity, and directing everyone's efforts towards the true good of man and the integral development of the peoples of the world.” (Quoted from: http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=38938)

3. When the Pope recently addressed the media he talked about how they have a responsibility not to blur reality and illusion. So often the media abuse the use of pictures because they can so easily trick us to see what the author wants us to see rather than what actually happened when the picture was taken. I also see this difficulty in perceiving truth on the internet when my son comes home from school and tells me that the teacher looked up something she didn't know on Wikipedia and it turns out to be incorrect.

Reginaldus said...

Cordelia,
That theology of death class sounds really interesting, and especially appropriate to reflect upon during this month of November and at the end of the Church's year!
Peace and blessings to you!
Fr. Reg

Cordelia at Catholic Phoenix said...

Here is a link to a brief course description of the Theology of Death class at The Institute of Catholic Theology started by Fr. John Erich, pastor of St. Thomas the Apostle parish. These classes are for the enrichment of adults and are open to the entire diocese of Phoenix. It's a great idea! Maybe you should start one at your parish with classes on St. Thomas Aquinas and Flannery O'Connor, of course. :)
http://www.staphx.org/institute/schedule.php#death

Reginaldus said...

Cordelia, That looks like a great program!
I do teach religion classes to junior high kids -- we are covering the sacraments right now, and I am pretty sure that they are getting a better education than had been offered in many seminaries! :)
The quality of the class does not come from me, of course; but from St. Thomas' Summa, which we follow quite carefully. And guess what...the kids love it! :)

Some day I would love to teach a year long class for adults on Catholic fiction literature -- discussing Flannery O'Connor and also the novels and short stories of G.K. Chesterton...

Blessings and peace to you in Jesus Christ our King and Eternal High Priest!

Anonymous said...

Couple things scanning through this blog.. and please don't take me too fanatical in my comments. I come with an "everyday" perspective.

-First, let's be clear: this blog is run by seminarians:-) Or else you all would use your real names instead of "code" names. Anybody would get this. Be careful, brothers. Although being "humble" might mean wanting to stay hidden-- I know also many fallen angels who like to stay hidden. I hope you guys are staying present to your seminarian brothers, in charity, if that is who you are. The seminary, as an apostolic community, is, in away, entitled to your presence there.

2. Is this what the Holy Father is calling in using the media to reach to today's youth who are very lost at sea? This is something that burns in my heart--as it did Newman's. Yet, if I would see an everyday kid in my high school read this blog I would of course be surprised. But I live in the real world. This website seems--clearly--to be about something else, an agenda if I might be rash; reaching a specific group within a very small fraction in the Church hierarchy/intelligentsia. You all, if that is your goal of reaching youth, need to actually be men and enter into their Cross instead of your own clerical wars. We need priests who reach out to the other, who find ways of meeting the lost sheep of today's world. We must use every weapon at our expense. This is what the Holy Father is asking. This blog reaches a select group within the Church.

We need priests who will be fisher's of men. Not ideologues. Intellectual pride is a very dangerous thing.

Code Name
"I Hunger"

Reginaldus said...

@I Hunger (8:32pm),
Thank you for your comments. You mention using "every weapon" we have to bring God's salvation to the world -- prayer is certainly that most powerful weapon, with it we will conquer all.

1) As you can see from our "Contributors" page, only one of the writers is a seminarian; another is a transitional deacon; the rest are priests.
The choice for anonymity is (as you suspected) related to seminary life, but not in the manner you are thinking...
Certainly, we have nothing to hide, but there is something to be said for writing with a pen-name, especially if one is writing (or hopes to write) for more serious theological journals with his real name.

Regarding our presence to others in the real world, you can see that I am pretty much the only contributor who writes with any regularity -- Campion posts every so often, the others almost never post.
I am a priest, I have a busy parish and many duties. I write as a means of keeping my academic life going. Thank you for your concern regarding my pastoral duties...my bishop has told me that he thinks I am fulfilling them more than adequately. Rather than watching TV, I read and write theology.

2) Pope Benedict does not seem to think that only youths go on-line, so I do not see any reason to think that every single Catholic blog should have to be addressed to young people.
This blog (especially my Thomistic Scripture Series) is particularly addressed to priests and also to theologically interested lay people. We are trying to offer an approachable tool for intellectual and spiritual formation. Again, it is especially for priests, but also for interested lay persons.

Regarding the ideology of this blog -- I simply refuse to admit that there is any "ideology", it is the Tradition of the Church which we champion! This Tradition is expressed in a particularly synthetic and easily approachable way by St. Thomas Aquinas (whom Vatican II calls our "teacher and guide". Hence, we are generally "Thomistic"; however, you will notice that I cite the Fathers of the Church (especially St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and St. Gregory the Great) quite often as well.
Regarding intellectual pride, I am indeed very proud (even perhaps a bit too proud) to claim St. Thomas for our Catholic Tradition; but I pray the Lord forgive this small fault as the too zealous love which a son has for his brilliant father. As for myself, I know that I am no great theologian, I can only hope to pass on what I have received...

Finally, I would recommend you look at our posts under the label "prayer". There are 15 of them (and another is coming this week). Here you will see that what we are most concerned about at NTM is growing in our relationship with the Lord. There are practical articles on Spiritual Direction, the Rosary, Spiritual Dryness, How to Make a Holy Hour, etc....
http://newtheologicalmovement.blogspot.com/search/label/Prayer

In any case, I hope you can understand why we created this blog ... even the Church hierarchy/intelligentsia needs the Gospel! Hopefully, we are able to reach others as well.

To the Greater Glory of God.

Anonymous said...

Reginald,

Thanks for your response. I guess I should have read the contributor page. Still, I had a hunch we had some seminarians here, and recently ordained men. I thank you for the reply, and for considering my disheveled worries as a layman.

First, let me say that it is a blessing that you and your brothers at the seminary were given the grace to actually study theology; and in the Thomistic tradition. St. Thomas is the Church's theologian, her common doctor: that would be nonsensical to argue. That wasn’t my worry here.

This is my worry: Now, in the domestic Church, what is harming families more than anything—at least in the first world—is the aftershocks of the TV, Internet, media culture. All of these aftershocks entail a crisis of being (and thus a huge crisis) leading to truncation of intimacy amongst members, and a sad wake of worldly propaganda and thinking. The husband (as Christ) is “pseudo-present with” his spouse (who is an image of the Church) in these pursuits, yet in truth the Spouse is present only as a body. They watch TV “together”? In the bosom of the family, there is no intimacy, no charity.

This tragedy is reflected into the seminary: Now, the seminary is the seedbed of the Church, and if one has read the apostolic visitations there is always a large warning sign with the over-usage of internet, media, etc cetera in the context of one’s time in these seed beds: be it usage of them for noble or ignoble reason. This is my concern. This is where the devil has hacked into the hardest. He is suffocating the soil of that seedbed with the same tactic as he is using in the families. The sad thing is that seminaries should be guarded—as any seed bed would be—from the sterilizing glance of the world. But it is more than this… Seminaries should require you to be FULLY present to the God who makes himself FULLY Present to you, and is giving Himself to you in your vocation. This is not easy; but essential. The priest, and priest in training seminarian, is not called to ‘just be present bodily’ to Christ and your brothers in the seminary, but even spiritually, and mentally (all your strength). If you are not present in all your strength in this concrete way, there cannot be the flowering of charity (which we in the world hunger for in you), nor that fruit joy (which we need in this time). Thus, the internet/tv/media keep you present only as a body to each other in seminary halls. The usage of these at this time should be amazingly minimal. Thus, at this time of formation, Charity is essential. Without this, you may be present, even most orthodox, but you are present in the bosom of the Church as a mere body. I am not calling you out. But calling many seminaries out. God doesn’t give himself in halves, right? Love cannot do that. In the hiddenness of her home, Mary’s Yes was whole; and the Holy Spirit was entirely given to her, forming Christ in her womb. The same should be in seminaries.

Anonymous said...

(...cntd)

Charity!!! is what the world needs. This is what we hunger for, and what will renew us in the heart of the Church. Thomas would agree. This Charity can happen only between persons fully present in truth and humility.

This is what perplexes me: The one who is given so much, in Charity, must reach out to the poverty of the other, he must empty himself in giving not to the nameless 99 on the internet but to the lost one who has a name present in his midst. This “must” can only happen in light of the law of gravity. God emptied himself, becoming poor so we might be one with him. Bethlehem means house of bread; we see the entire mystery of salvation present in the cresh; he who would give himself as bread. Yet, he called poor shepherds to be his first witnesses in this world. The fruit of contemplation, if it is ripe and heavy in a soul, the gravity of love causes the branch of the tree, of the Christian man, to bend low—low enough so the poor can reach the fruit. For that is who Christ came for. The poor hunger for this Charity now. The priest needs to be this branch which bends low more than ever. He must remain in Christ so he can be this branch. If we have them, we need blogs who somehow bend AMAZINGLY LOW to the poor as this branch. The searching, the poor, are the ones, afterall, mainly feeding on the “information highway” in need of food for the journey.

“I Thirst”

Reginaldus said...

@ I thirst/hunger,
Thank you for the further clarification. I certainly agree, charity is essential. Also, you are quite right that there is too much TV and internet in seminaries these days... I have seen this in the not so distant past...

However, one point I would make -- the real answer (in my opinion) to the problem in contemporary seminaries is not a whole lot more fraternity and common time. Believe me, there is already a lot of time just spent goofing around and having fun -- and that is good, and even necessary!

However, what we really need is a renewal in the intellectual life. You may say, "What about the spiritual life?" I can tell you that some of the biggest problems in priestly spirituality stem from serious theological errors -- study would do much to help the men pray more devoutly and more fervently.

The seminarian needs to give himself over entirely to the life of prayer and study. Fraternity is important during his recreation, but it is not the center of seminarian formation. I only wish seminarians would spend more of their Saturdays and weekday afternoons in the library, rather than walking around the halls and playing out on the sports field.

Thus, I am far less concerned about how much time a seminarian spends in the "community lounge"...I have only seen a handful who needed to focus more on "fraternity". I am very concerned about how much time a seminarian spends reading good theology (St. Thomas and the Fathers)...I have only seen a handful who do enough of this.

Thus, I do not find this blog to be a real danger to seminary formation...In fact, I know that it is doing a lot to help men enter more deeply into theological study.

Tangent said...

Father Reginaldus.. I greatly appreciate all your efforts.
Your blog is making me strong in my everyday life.
I am a born catholic but I have not even read The Holy Bible completely and I greatly regret and repent my ignorance in the past. I started to know more about our Lord few months back by prayer, reading Bible and through Catholic blogs. And your blog is the light where I can meditate on the life of Jesus and traditions.
By noway your blog is only for theologians, in fact I would say,if any lay person has an immense desire to learn and live a better life, it serves as a manual. And it's every Christian's duty to learn the meaning of The Holy Word. Being a lay person is no excuse when there are means to know and practice it in their life .
I thank you and wish you all the best in your mission. : )

Please pray for me..

Preethi D'Souza
India

Reginaldus said...

Tangent (Preethi),
Thank you for your kind words and encouragement.

I will certainly remember you in prayer during this season of Lent.
Blessings to you in Christ our Savior. +

Tangent said...

Thank you father.

Praise the Lord.

Post a Comment

If you want your comment to be published: Use a name or pseudonym, and keep it short (generally, less than 100 words), to the point, and civil.

All comments must be approved by a blog-administrator. If your comment is deleted, please don't take it personally.