Wednesday, July 27, 2011

How long should I fast before receiving Holy Communion?

It is common to hear nowadays that one need only fast for an hour before the reception of Holy Communion. While this is technically true, is it the mind of the Church? To understand the question we first need to understand what fasting is and then how it pertains to one's reception of Holy Communion.

First, most basically, to fast is to abstain from food or drink for a certain period of time. The Latin word ieiunium refers to a part of an animal's intestine that is always empty. This denial of the desire for food - closely connected to the desire for sex - is an apostolic and perennial part of the Church's life and discipline. Already in the Acts of the Apostles (13:2) we find the practice of fasting connected to the Christian Liturgy and therefore the Biblical basis for the Church's mandatory Eucharistic fast. " While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, "Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them." (Acts 13:2)


The Church's local and ecumenical Councils from the very beginning taught that only those fasting may celebrate and receive the Lord's Body and Blood so as to show the priority of the Lord's food over earthly food and to eradicate any possibility of the shameful practices of the early Corinthian community. (1 Cor 11: 17-33) Saint Augustine elucidates the reasons in a most concise and perfect manner: "It has pleased the Holy Ghost that, to honor so great a Sacrament, the Lord's Body should enter the mouth of the Christian before other food." (St. Augustine, Ep. 54, , cap. 6: , PL, 33, 203)

The canonical tradition of the Church clear demonstrates the seriousness with which the Church takes the Eucharistic fast. The Venerable Pius XII in his Apostolic Constitution Christus Dominus teaches: "The solicitude of the Church for the preservation of the Eucharistic fast may be perceived also from the fact that the Church, in decreeing this fast, imposed serious penalties for its violation. Thus the Seventh Council of Toledo in the year 646 threatened with excommunication anyone who should say Mass after having broken his fast.[13] In the year 672 the Third Council of Braga,[14] and in the year 685 the Second Council of Macon[15] had already pronounced that anyone who incurred this guilt should be deposed from his office and deprived of his honors."

It wasn't until November 21, 1964 that Pope Paul VI reduced the Eucharistic fast to one hour. Finally there is an interesting addition that was made in the second schema to the 1983 Code of Canon Law which continued through and remains in the final edition of the Code. The Canon reads as follows: "One who is to receive the Most Holy Eucharist is to abstain from any food or drink, with the exception of water and medicine, for at least the period of one hour before Holy Communion." (The Code of Canon Law, Canon 919) For at least one hour… This "saltem" clause rather nicely articulates the proper hermeneutic of this question in line with Pius XII and Paul VI. One is permitted to receive having only fasted for an hour but one is encouraged to keep the traditional fast from midnight if possible or the three hour fast for a legitmate reason. The spiritual benefits and reasons for the traditional and immemorial fast retain all of their relevance and value.

For further reading, please read The Venerable Pius XII's Christus Dominus.

11 comments:

Father Ryan Erlenbush said...

Father Martin,
I'm sure you are familiar with the work of Dr. Ed Peters.
He has a great article on this very subject: http://www.canonlaw.info/2008/06/proposal-extend-communion-fast.html

His main point is that a canonical requirement of a one hour fast will undermine the very nature of the fast itself (because the Sunday Mass is long enough to make the hour fast a mute point).

In any case, Bshp. Fulton Sheen insisted that the relaxation of the fast (at his time, to only three hours) was so that the PRIEST might be able to drink coffee in the morning before offering the DAILY morning Mass.
How far we have fallen -- people today are regularly eating solid food before coming to the spiritual banquet!

Thanks for the post. +

Father Martin said...

Father Erlenbush, thanks for the link and the info about Archbishop Fulton Sheen. Pax tibi fratre mi.

Anonymous said...

So to be clear; we are required to fast at least one hour before receiving communion, not one hour before Mass begins.

I assist at the 4:30pm Mass of Anticipation on Saturday evening. So, from what you say the Church really wants me to do,I should fast from 12:00am Saturday until 4:30pm Saturday evening. Sixteen hours. Very good.

Thank you,
D.C.

Father Ryan Erlenbush said...

That's right D.C. ... and if you don't pass out, it means your not trying hard enough! :-)

Oh, were we having a serious discussion here?
I must have missed your point: I was too busy loading up burdens hard to carry, and not lifting a finger myself.

dcs said...

Jone (who wrote at the time that the strict fast from midnight was still the law of the Church) recommends a fast of four hours before Midnight Mass. Extrapolating from that, we might consider fasting for four hours before an evening Mass (which also was not allowed during Fr. Jone's time) at which we might receive Communion.

I've assisted at Masses at which I could have eaten during Mass and still kept the modern fast. Surely that is not what the Church intends.

Father Martin said...

D.C.

It is at least one hour before the reception of Holy Communion that the Church requires of you. Obviously, I wasn't saying you need fast from midnight for a vigil Mass. I think the 3 hour fast would be very good in your situation if you are able to do so.

I hope that helps.

Peace in Christ.

Anonymous said...

Fr. Martin and Fr. Ryan,

I apologize for the sarcasm. I have been a reader of this blog for some time and enjoy it very much.

Fr. Ryan your posts on the Eucharist were extremely helpful to me and also introduced me to Abbott Vonier. I purchased his book on the key to understanding the Eucharist and it gave me an insight that I found truly remarkable. Since then I've located his collected works, which are sadly out of print, through inter-library loan and they are a treasure.

I meant the sarcasm in a light hearted way and the point I was trying to make was that, while I agree with Fr. Martin's position on the Echaristic fast, I think we have to be careful when we start talking about "the mind of the Church" on a certain matter when the Church has clearly spelled out for us in canon law what our requiremnts are for fasting. That said, I do think we should give serious consideraton to the "spirit" of the law not the letter. In doing so, we'll not be worried about counting that hour down, but about the meaning of why we fast before receiving Holy Communion in the first place, which Fr. martin has aptly shown us.

Thank you again for this blog and both of you in your priestly ministry

D.C.

Larry said...

A couple of comments - we've been fasting from the night before for all morning Masses for some time in our family. Although, I do drink water in the morning. Is water a violation of the fast?

Sometimes, if I am assisting at an afternoon Mass, I may realize I ate something not long before, perhaps because I just wasn't thinking. In those cases, I will make a spiritual Communion. In some senses, I wish spiritual Communion were more widespread, especially with regard to issues like this. It seems in many people's minds today, if you are at Mass, you MUST receive.

Been reading for a long time. Nice to finally meet you! I had Reginaldus pegged for a late-middle age Englishman.

Father Ryan Erlenbush said...

D.C.,
No worries! I meant my comments light-heartedly as well ... though the hard edge was also intended.

In any case, peace to you ... And I'm delighted to hear that you have found Vonier! +

pewpewaliens said...

4:30PM anticipation Mass? Isn't that veery early?

Ted K said...

I think the main reason for the changes in fasting from midnight fast to a few hours before receiving communion was the changes to the liturgy. Except for Midnight Mass, no Masses were allowed to be celebrated outside of morning for centuries. That even included the Pascal Vigil which was celebrated in the mornings and which formed an entire tradition of Catholic families visiting local monasteries for a day on Holy Saturday. It was in the 1950's that Masses started being celebrated in the afternoons and evenings as a concession to the industrial world, or, as in the case of the Paschal Vigil, restoring ancient practice. Priests found it difficult to fast from the night before for an evening Mass, as no doubt did the faithful coming to Mass who were being urged to receive communion since the time of St Pius X.

Post a Comment

If you want your comment to be published: Use a name or pseudonym, and keep it short (generally, less than 100 words), to the point, and civil.

All comments must be approved by a blog-administrator. If your comment is deleted, please don't take it personally.