Daily Sermons, August 20 and 26-30.
St Agnes, St Cletus, St Peter Canisius, St Louis de Montfort, St Peter Martyr, St Catherine of Siena.
▼
Saturday, April 30, 2016
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
How St. Louis de Montfort Changed the Rosary
April 28th, Feast of St. Louis
Marie de Montfort
Have you
ever noticed that there is no separate bead for the Glory be prayer in the Rosary? Containing 59 beads, the Rosary
string has specific beads only for the 53 Hail
Marys and the six Our Fathers.
Although certain methods of praying the Rosary will assign the Glory be or Fatima prayers to one bead
or another, there is clearly no universally solidified practice – in many
places the Glory be will be prayed on
the “chain” between the final Hail Mary bead of one decade and the Our Father
bead of the following decade.
The cause
for this slight “confusion” (if we can call it that) as to in which place the Glory be is to be prayed is found in the
fact that the Rosary did not originally include the Glory be (or, of course, the Fatima prayer). This little prayer was
added by the great Apostle of the Rosary, St. Louis Marie de Montfort, showing
the essentially Trinitarian character of his Marian devotion.
Sunday, April 24, 2016
Who was St Mark? And Why is he pictured as a lion?
April 25th, Feast of St Mark the
Evangelist
In the
Roman Martyrology for April 25th, we find: “At Alexandria, the
[heavenly] birthday of Blessed Mark the Evangelist, he, for the faith of
Christ, being stretched and bound with cords, was dragged over the rocks, and
grievously tormented. Afterwards, being shut up in prison, he was first
comforted by an angelic vision, and at last by the appearance of the Lord
Himself, by whom he was called to the heavenly kingdom in the eighth year of
Nero.”
In honor
of this great saint and evangelist, we do well to consider certain details of
his person. Who was he? Is he John Mark? Was he a priest? Had he ever met
Jesus? Why is he presented under the figure of a lion?
Who was Saint Mark?
While
there are some who maintain that St Mark the Evangelist was among the 72
disciples and had for a time lapsed from the true faith only to be re-converted
and reconciled through St Peter some time after Pentecost, it is better to assert
that St Mark had never known Christ during his earthly life but was converted
to the faith by St Peter some time in the first years after Pentecost. This is
the most natural read of Sacred Scripture, when St Peter testifies that St Mark
is his spiritual son (“Mark, my son”, 1 Peter 5:13).
Some maintain
that the young man who followed our Lord after his arrest in the Garden but who
was then seized by the soldiers and abandoned his garment to flee away naked
into the night (cf. Mark 14:51) is St Mark the Evangelist, but nothing in the
text indicates this. Indeed, while it is clear that this young man must not
have been one of the Apostles (who had already fled), there is no indication
that he is the Author of the Gospel either. Rather, it is more probably that he
was either some other disciple of the Lord who had only just come upon the
scene, or with less probability, he may have been John Mark (who is supposed to
have been the man who owned the house in which the Last Supper took place).
Indeed,
another common confusion is to identify St Mark the Evangelist with John Mark
who was a disciple of St Paul and traveled with St Paul and Barnabas in their
missionary journeys through Greece. John Mark is referred to by St Paul in his
Letter to Philemon as well as in Colossians 4 and 2 Timothy 4. However, that
John Mark is not the same as Mark the Evangelist is clear from this point: St
Mark the Evangelist was the close disciple of St Peter and was with St Peter in
Rome at the same time that John Mark was with St Paul in Greece. Indeed, the
ancient tradition connects St Mark the Evangelist with the cities of Aquileia
in Italy and Alexandria in Egypt – John Mark, on the other hand, is not known
to have preached the Gospel in these places.
Thus,
following Father Cornelius a Lapide, it is perhaps best to assert that St Mark
the Evangelist was an Hebrew and likely a priest of the tribe of Levi (as St
Bede the Venerable teaches). He was converted to Christianity and baptized by
St Peter some time after Pentecost, and accompanies the Prince of the Apostles
even to Rome. Later, he was sent by St Peter to preach the Gospel in Egypt and
was Bishop of the Church in Alexandria. Here he gave witness to Christ through
martyrdom.
Why is St Mark pictured as a lion?
And as for the likeness of their faces: there
was the face of a man, and the face of a lion on the right side of all the
four: and the face of an ox, on the left side of all the four: and the face of
an eagle over all the four. (Ezekiel 1:10)
The
Church interprets the four living creatures as symbolic of the four
Evangelists. Borrowing from Ezekiel and from the Book of Revelation, we see St
Matthew pictured as a man, St Mark as a lion, St Luke as an ox, and St John as
an eagle. Why is St Mark represented by the figure of a lion?
The
images of the four Evangelists are taken in large part from the manner in which
they begin their Gospels. As St Matthew begins with the human geneology of
Jesus, he is pictured as a man. St John soars to the heights of the eagle with In the beginning was the Word, and St Luke calls to mind the sacrificial
offering of the ox beginning with the sacrifice which Zachariah offered in the
Temple. Thus also St Mark, who opens with the mighty roar of St John the
Baptist’s call to repentance, is pictured under the powerful image of the lion.
An additional meaning which could be signified by the lion relates to a tradition which considers St Mark as the founder of monastic life and of the desert fathers. Since St Mark is the father of the Church of Alexandria and since this Church produced the great movement of consecrated religious life as hermit, anchorite, monk, or nun, St Mark is rightly considered by St Jerome and John Cassian to be the founder of monasteries and hermitages. Now, lions are often connected with the desert fathers and other ancient monks -- whether we think of St Paul the Hermit and St Anthony of Egypt (whose graves were dug by lions), or of St Jerome (pictured with the lion he cured), or even St Blase (who as a hermit was surrounded by lions and other wild beasts). Therefore, the image of the lion calls to mind St Mark's connection with Alexandria and his role as the spiritual father of religious life in the Church.
An additional meaning which could be signified by the lion relates to a tradition which considers St Mark as the founder of monastic life and of the desert fathers. Since St Mark is the father of the Church of Alexandria and since this Church produced the great movement of consecrated religious life as hermit, anchorite, monk, or nun, St Mark is rightly considered by St Jerome and John Cassian to be the founder of monasteries and hermitages. Now, lions are often connected with the desert fathers and other ancient monks -- whether we think of St Paul the Hermit and St Anthony of Egypt (whose graves were dug by lions), or of St Jerome (pictured with the lion he cured), or even St Blase (who as a hermit was surrounded by lions and other wild beasts). Therefore, the image of the lion calls to mind St Mark's connection with Alexandria and his role as the spiritual father of religious life in the Church.
Additional
notes to support our thesis above:
St Jerome
(Catalogue of Ecclesiatical Writers: “Mark was a disciple and interpreter of St
Peter. At the request of the brethren at Rome, he wrote a short Gospel, based
upon what he had heard St Peter relate. This, when Peter had heard, he approved
of, and sanctioned its being read in the Church […] Mark took his Gospel, which
he had compiled, and went to Egypt. He first preached Christ at Alexandria, and
founded a Church there, which possessed such great purity of doctrine and life
that it influenced all followers of Christ by its example.”
Again, St
Jermone (Introduction to the Commentary on Matthew): “Mark, the interpreter of
the Apostle Peter, who indeed had not himself seen the Lord, the Saviour, but
had heard his master’s preaching, related according to the truth of the things
which were done, rather than the order in which they were done.”
Clement of
Alexandria (tom. 6, in Biblioth. Patr. in Edit. Parisiensi.): “Mark, the
follower of Peter, when Peter was preaching the Gospel publicly at Rome, in the
presence of certain knights of Caesar’s household, and was advancing many
testimonies about Christ, being requested by them, wrote from the things which
were spoken by Peter a Gospel, which is called that according to Mark.”
Sunday Sermon, April 24 - Eucharistic Love
Sermon Given at Corpus Christi Parish by Father Ryan Erlenbush. April 24, 5th Sunday of Easter.
"As I have loved you, so you should love one another."
The new commandment of love is given in the context of the Last Supper, indicating that this a Eucharistic Love. Holy Communion inspires within us a love of our fellow Catholic and christian, a love of the poor, and a love of all people.
"As I have loved you, so you should love one another."
The new commandment of love is given in the context of the Last Supper, indicating that this a Eucharistic Love. Holy Communion inspires within us a love of our fellow Catholic and christian, a love of the poor, and a love of all people.
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Sunday Sermon, April 17 -- Hearing the Voice of the Shepherd, and the Call to Celibacy
Sermon for the 4th Sunday of Easter - April 17, 2016 -- Given by Father Ryan Erlenbush at Corpus Christi Parish, Great Falls, Montana.
"My sheep hear my voice, I know them and they follow me."
A note prior to the sermon discusses the recent Exhortation written by Pope Francis (what the Pope himself actually says is important to focus on, rather than what the media focuses on).
Sermon: Hearing the voice of Jesus in my heart requires hearing his voice in the magisterium of the Church, following his voice by living a moral life, and listening for his voice in daily prayer. We then consider the call to the priesthood and the religious life, specifically the vocation to celibacy which is the happiest life this side of heaven.
"My sheep hear my voice, I know them and they follow me."
A note prior to the sermon discusses the recent Exhortation written by Pope Francis (what the Pope himself actually says is important to focus on, rather than what the media focuses on).
Sermon: Hearing the voice of Jesus in my heart requires hearing his voice in the magisterium of the Church, following his voice by living a moral life, and listening for his voice in daily prayer. We then consider the call to the priesthood and the religious life, specifically the vocation to celibacy which is the happiest life this side of heaven.
Daily Mass Homilies, April 4 - 16 (Father Ryan Erlenbush, Corpus Christi Parish)
Homilies from daily Masses at Corpus Christ in Great Falls, Montana. April 4 through April 16.
The Annunciation, St Vincent Ferrer, Ad Orientem, Catholic Schools, St Giuseppe Moscati, St Hermenegild, St Benezet, The Eucharist, Our Lady
The Annunciation, St Vincent Ferrer, Ad Orientem, Catholic Schools, St Giuseppe Moscati, St Hermenegild, St Benezet, The Eucharist, Our Lady
Thursday, April 14, 2016
“My sheep hear my voice and no one shall pluck them out of my hand” does not mean “Once saved, always saved”
4th Sunday of Easter
John 20:27-30
My sheep hear my voice. And I know them: and
they follow me. And I give them life everlasting: and they shall not perish for
ever. And no man shall pluck them out of my hand.
John
10:27-28 is a classic text used by Evangelical Protestants to promote the “once
saved, always saved” heretical doctrine of grace. Their argument runs like
this: “If you are Jesus’ sheep, then you will hear his voice and be saved and
never fall away. Therefore, if you hear his voice and believe, you are his sheep
and will certainly be saved – once you are saved, you will always be saved.
However, if you fall away after apparently believing for some time, it is clear
that you never really were one of the sheep in the first place.”
But Jesus
didn’t say that “my sheep will never fall away,” he only said no one shall pluck them out of my hand –
and this makes all the difference!
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
Correcting a Common Misinterpretation of Last Sunday's Gospel: St. Peter DID NOT Sin When He Returned to Fishing
John 21:1-19
There were together: Simon Peter
and Thomas, who is called Didymus, and Nathanael, who was of Cana of Galilee,
and the sons of Zebedee and two others of his disciples. Simon Peter saith to
them: I go a fishing. They say to him: We also come with thee.
It
is astonishing how popular an errant interpretation of a biblical passage can
become. Said by some priest somewhere, it will be picked up by many more and
soon becomes the standard interpretation of a given text. Such is the case with
John 21:2-3, when St. Peter and the other Apostles return to the practice of
fishing after our Lord’s Resurrection. Although many a Catholic heard last
weekend that Peter and the others were “backsliding” by returning to fishing,
the Catholic read of this Gospel has always maintained that the Apostles not
only did not sin, but in fact are praiseworthy in their fishing trip.
Considering
first the commentatorial tradition of the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, we
will then look to the Gospel text itself and see that St Peter and the other
Apostles did nothing wrong when they went fishing perhaps two weeks after our
Lord had risen from the dead.