Solemnity
of Corpus Christi
In the sacramental theology of
the Church, we must recognize a threefold distinction. In Latin: Res, Sacramentum,
Res et Sacramentum. In English: Reality,
Sacrament, Reality and Sacrament. The reality
is that invisible grace given by the sacrament. The sacrament is that visible sign which is used in the rite. And the reality and sacrament is an invisible
reality which is yet a sign of something further (like, for example, the way
the sacred character of baptism is a reality in the soul of the baptized but is
also a sacrament of the individual’s participation in Christ).
To properly understand the
manner in which the Mass is a sacrifice, we must understand how each of these
elements relates to the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. This will
make clear how it is that, even though Jesus does not die upon the altar but
remains living and glorified in the Holy Eucharist, the Mass is yet the very
self-same sacrifice of the Cross.
Res tantum (The thing or reality alone): The grace of
the Sacrament
The res of the Eucharist is twofold: the Real Presence of Christ and
the Mystical Body of Christ which is the Church. Further, we may state that the
reality of this sacrament is the
grace given to the one who receives worthily.
Sacramentum tantum (The sign or sacrament alone): The visible species of bread and wine
The simple sign or outward
sacrament, in the case of the Eucharist, is the visible bread and wine. These
are a sign insofar as they are food which give nourishment and refreshment to
the body. Thus also, the Body and Blood of Christ are spiritual nourishment for
the soul.
Further, as those who join in a
common meal are made one; so too, the Church is united in this sacred feast.
Res et Sacramentum (The reality or thing which is also a sign
or sacrament of a further reality): The glorified Body and Blood of Christ
Now, we had earlier that the
Real Presence of Jesus in the Holy Eucharist is one res of this sacrament. However, Christ’s Presence is not merely a res, for it is a sacramental presence. Therefore, it is obvious that the Real
Presence is the res et sacramentum
(the thing and the sign) of the Eucharist.
We must specify: The Real
Presence of Christ in the Eucharist is res
et sacramentum insofar as the glorified Body of Christ (under the visible
sign of bread) and the glorified Blood of Christ (under the visible sign of
wine) are the res et sacramentum of
the Eucharist.
Surely, the body and blood,
soul and divinity of Jesus are wholly present in each species and under each of
their parts. Still, it is not for no reason that we call the one the sacrament
of Christ’s body and the other the sacrament of his blood. In her sacred rites,
the Church refers to the one as “The Body of Christ” and the other as “The
Blood of Christ” (as, for example, in the distribution of Holy Communion).
For more on this, please
consider our earlier article [here].
For now, we will focus only on
this one point: The glorified and living Body of Christ and the glorified and
living Blood of Christ are themselves not mere realities but are also signs and
sacraments of another reality.
Upon the altar of the Mass, the
glorified and living Body of Christ is sacramentally separated from the glorified
and living Blood of Christ (in truth, they are united, as the whole Jesus is wholly
present in each). They are sacramentally
separated, insofar as the one is the sacrament of his Body and the other the
sacrament of his Blood. Thus, under sacramental signification, we see the body
and blood of Christ separated upon the altar.
This separation of the two
Eucharistic species is the sacrament of the Cross – the only time and place in
which the body and blood of Christ were separated as the lance of Longinus
pierced the expired Heart of our Savior to allow both blood and water to pour
forth.
Thus, as the body and blood of
Christ were (in their proper and natural species) separated upon the altar of
the Cross, so too they are (in their sacramental species) separated upon the
altar of the Mass. This is why the Mass is a sacrifice, because it is a
sacramental sacrifice.
Not
two sacrifices, but only one sacrifice
The Mass is a sacramental
sacrifice, not a physical and bloody sacrifice. Just as there are not two
bodies of Christ (one in heaven and one in the sacrament), so too there cannot
be two sacrifices (one on Calvary and one in the Mass).
No, precisely because the
Eucharist is a sacrament and the sacrifice is a sacramental sacrifice, there is
no multiplication of offerings or of deaths. Jesus died once and only once for
all people, and this one death is made sacramentally present through the
sacramental separation of the body and blood of Christ upon the altar.
Jesus present in the Blessed
Sacrament is living, but his Presence is itself a sacrament of when he was
dead.
From
the Angelic Thomas
When considering whether it
would be superfluous for the whole Christ (body and blood, soul and divinity) to
be present under each species, the Doctor from Aquino states:
“Although the whole Christ is under each species, yet it is
so not without purpose. For in the first place this serves to represent Christ’s
Passion, in which the blood was separated from the body; hence in the form for
the consecration of the blood mention is made of its shedding.” (ST III, q.76,
a.2, ad 1 [here])
4 comments:
Good post!
Additionally, one might also point out that sacrifice includes being given over to the Father. Hence why Christ's obedience is pointed out by Paul rather than Christ's death alone. Christ as given over to the Father inwardly and sacramentally are present in the sacrament of the altar.
Augustine City of God 10.6 is very helpful on this point.
St. Nicholas Cabasilas in MY LIFE IN CHRIST, his work about the Sacraments, said that the Sacrifice of the Eucharist was precisely the change of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of the Sacrificed Lamb of God Who lived, was dead, and is now alive forevermore.
St. Nicholas was an Orthodox writer, but I don't see how his words would be unacceptable to a Catholic.
Dear Father. Which offering, The Lil' Licit Liturgy or the Real Mass, best makes present to all the very truths you describe? (That sentence is called leading the witness)
Of course the TLM and the normative Mass are both valid but the reality the Lil' Licit Liturgy eliminated the offertory alone makes it less of a sign is what I claim.
Could you help me? Is the Church a Sacrament?
Post a Comment
When commenting, please leave a name or pseudonym at the end of your comment so as to facilitate communication and responses.
Comments must be approved by the moderator before being published.