October 13th, 1917 -
Miracle of the Sun, Fatima
Although an
hundred thousand individuals, from many diverse faiths and from no faith, spread
out even over several miles, saw the “miracle of the sun,” at Fatima in
Portugal on 13 October 1917, yet not a single shred of astronomical data
indicates that the sun really did “dance” on that day.
What is the
believer to make of this fact? How ought we to respond to the doubts of many
who claim that, since the sun does not seem to have moved at all from his
normal place in the heavens (at least, no scientific observatory noted any such
motion), the event must have been nothing more than mass-hysteria?
In
2011, we wrote an article [here] discussing the nature of the Miracle of
Fatima. At that time, we indicated that the “miracle of the sun” was indeed a
real miracle, but had nothing to do with the sun at all.
The evidence: Something happened
It must be
clear to all that something wondrous did indeed happen that day at the Cova da
Iria. Estimates of those present range from 30,000 to over 100,000 individuals –
but what is most striking is not merely the sheer mass of witnesses, but the
fact that many of those present were non-believers, communists, and others for
whom we have no reason to suppose a religious conviction or desire which would induce
either the fabrication of testimony or an hallucination.
Additionally,
even among the many Catholic believers present, a good number of these doubted
the message of the children and had no expectation of witnessing a miracle on
that day. These too, then, cannot be reasonable supposed to have fabricated the
event in their imaginations.
Although the
testimony of exactly how the sun moved varies to some degree, we must propose
that those present saw something phenomenal as can be garnered from the statements
of witnesses who describe how the sun “danced” in the sky and then came
crashing toward the earth at a rapid speed! Then, suddenly, the sun returned to
his place in the sky, and the crowd was astonished to find that their cloths
and the earth which had been soaking wet due to a hard rain, were now
completely dry.
So
terrifying was this event that, it is said, many person fell to the earth or
hid under rocks and trees. Many thought that the time of the universal judgment
had arrived, and so they quite literally cried out their sins at the top of
their voice, begging the Lord’s pardon. It would take quite a lot for any of us
to confess our sins publicly in this manner! Certainly, something great was occurring
to move people to such an intense fear of the Lord.
Furthermore,
the witnesses of the event are not limited simply to those present in the field
outside of Fatima. We note that there were some as far as eleven miles away who
claim to have seen the sun move in this miraculous fashion.
All of this
seems to preclude any theory either of mass-hysteria or mass-deception. Those
present saw something marvelous on that day: It appeared that the sun danced in
the sky and then fell towards the earth (drying the people, their clothes, and
the ground), before returning to the heavens.
The evidence: The sun didn’t move
On the other
hand, it is a simple fact that the sun did not move. We know this on two
accounts: First, none of the observatories throughout the world noticed any such
movement in the sun. Second, although many people from even several miles away
witnessed something marvelous on 13 October 1917, the vast majority of the
human population witnessed no such miracle. Additionally, while it is quite awesome
that the wet land was dried by the “miracle of the sun,” the rest of the water
on earth was in no greater measure dried by this event.
Hence, for
all these reasons, we must conclude that the sun in no way moved during the “miracle
of the sun” in Fatima. If it had, the whole world would have seen the event, it
would have been registered in many astronomical observatories, and a great bit
of dampness throughout the earth’s surface would have evaporated.
A possible explanations
We already
have noted that various explanations are impossible – mass-hysteria,
hallucinations, intentional deception. Together with these, we add any real
change in the sun himself.
One possible
explanation comes from a Catholic priest and scientist, Fr Stanley Jaki. Fr
Jaki indicates that it is likely that, as the sun did not move, the event was
the result of a sudden temperature inversion combined with countless additional
natural phenomena which made it appear to all present (and even within several
miles of the field) that the sun was falling from the sky.
Fr Jaki
insists that this even would nevertheless be a natural “miracle” insofar as the
collusion of so many diverse natural elements at the very time which had been
predicted by the Mother of God through the children is so great as to be
supernatural in origin.
For a positive
article about Fr Jaki’s research, see
Stacy Transacos’ writing [here].
The best answer: A miracle of
biblical proportions
For our
part, we do not hold peace with Fr Jaki. Indeed, his explanation reduces the miracle
to an essential natural event. Furthermore, the number of natural factors which
would have had to come together to make his event even a remote possibility is
so great as to be entirely improbable. While it is true that Fr Jaki would
respond: “That is what makes it a miracle!” We reply: “Then it is more probable
to propose a real miracle.”
Therefore,
it seems most likely that a new object was formed in the sky, perhaps several
hundred feet in the air above the field. It was filled with an intense light
and also seems to have produced an intense heat. This newly created atmospheric
ball was moved (it seems) by angels and is most closely comparable to the
Pillar of Fire or (perhaps) to the Star of Bethlehem.
We propose
that the angels, directed by our Lady, made this massive “ball” of dust or gas
which then shone so bright by the infusion of light as to hide the sun from
view. This angelic ball or mass would resemble something like an extremely
dense cloud, which was then filled with light of many different colors. This
object would then appear to all present in the field, as well as to those
within several miles of the event, as being the sun himself, crashing to earth!
The
postulation of such an object as this “mini-sun” would explain why the rest of
the world saw no change in the sun. Furthermore, we would see clearly why those
present would have been so awestruck and terrified – for something really was
crashing toward earth, something majestic and great, an angelic “mini-sun”!
By this postulation,
we have not only a miracle, but a miracle of biblical proportions which harkens
back to the Exodus from the land of slavery and to the Light for revelation to
the gentiles given in the Christ Child.
Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for us!
18 comments:
Thanks for the post, I found it quite enlightening!
God bless
In light of what is going on at the Synod and the fact Our Lady's request has still not been carried out vis a vis the Consecration of Russia, we should pray even with more ardor to Our Blessed Mother.
Fascinating! I never thought of this miracle in the way you have placed it, Father. Thank you.
Woody
I would go with Dr. Jaki. Don't forget how a rainbow forms: many small droplets of water disperse sunlight into its colors and reflect back again toward the observer. Earth intercepts all kinds of bits and pieces of rock and ice every day as it moves along its orbit. This miracle occurred at noon or so, I thin, so a big blob of water ice and carbon dioxide ice coming from the direction of the sun, would have certainly formed lensing and other dispersion of sunlight. It would be interesting to model on a computer. Not sure how to produce the spinning effect, but the rapid return of the sun's disc to its normal position on the sky is the giveaway, in my opinion.
In any case, an excellent miracle, and it definitely caught the attention of everybody, even those hard-hearted communists! =)
Would several hundred feet have been sufficient?
It could just as easily been what is now called a UFO, although a large one. A few witnesses said that it looked like a silvery disk spinning. That sounds a lot like a UFO.
After all, this also would explain the UFO phenomenon as being either angelic (as in the case of Fatima) or demonic (in many other cases) rather than being alien beings, of which there is no evidence for and which would cause theological difficulties for Christians.
I am unclear why there needs to be a physical and natural account that explains the miraculous vision at all, even if the physical account is explained as miraculous. The truth is that the sun danced. And God can make it dance and not dance simultaneously. Thousands saw it, and have testified to the truth.
Science has little concern for truth, it is only seeking for facts and data - even though science has eyes it cannot see.
Anonymous 7:19,
God cannot make the sun both dance and not dance "simultaneously" -- because even God cannot break the principle of non-contradiction. That would be to deny himself.
Your comment is an excellent example of how many believers expose our Faith to ridicule.
Excellent article :)
The Miracle of the Sun is a sign of a future event. It will be similar to Joshua Chapter 10.
Have we had the peace Our Lady promised? The answer is no. If Her request had been carried out, would we have the worldwide chaos we are currently experiencing?
Sentient extraterrestrial life would in no way cause theological difficulties for Christians. What difference is life 3,000 miles across an ocean of water (Natives in the New World) vs 3,000 light years across an ocean of space? Merely numbers.
The miracle of the sun undoubtedly happened as you have well demonstrated. However, I think that the explanation will just have to be "God did it" without trying a scientific explanation. In particular the drying of clothes and the ground in a couple of minutes would have required an extraordinary amount of heat which would have been harmful to the witnesses. Moreover, since people in nearby towns also saw it (but did not see the sun in its ordinary place at the same time), it cannot be explained by simply stating that there was something there besides the real sun while the real sun went on shining as usual. Let's just say it was a miracle which like all real miracles defies a scientific explanation.
I too, believe there was a miracle at Fatima: 1) the reported extraordinary number of witnesses (a forensic fact); 2) the precision of dates predicted & occurred; 3) the selectivity of the lensing effect, as explained by Fr Jaki (e.g. full-circle rainbows have been reported by few) - these reasons are enough for me.
the full-circle rainbow i am stating is not connected to the miracle of Fatima.
Anonymous,
A mini-sun moved about and illumined by the angels is not a scientific way of explaining away the miracle. It certainly would defy all scientific explanation.
Your comment would be like saying - "let's just admit Mary was with child and not try to explain everything by possiting the angel Gabriel."
Also, it was a cloudy day. So the sun was not visible in nearby areas. That is why some from several miles away only saw this angelic sun crashing to earth.
Anonymouses,
No further anonymous comments will be published. Use a pseudonym as requested.
Father:
I have not read of any follow-up data as to cancers etc. of the witnesses at Fatima. I am wondering if data as to radiation elevations or radiation poisoning may have occurred. Have you?
Post a Comment
When commenting, please leave a name or pseudonym at the end of your comment so as to facilitate communication and responses.
Comments must be approved by the moderator before being published.